MarketScale

The B2B Marketing Index

The State of
B2B Marketing.

One report fusing a cross-platform AI-visibility benchmark, a twelve-year content corpus, what content actually earns trust, and the live signal from the field. Not a survey. The data itself.

Reporting period 2026-03-05 to 2026-06-03

5
AI engines benchmarked
1,000 AI responses analyzed
41,180
Brand mentions analyzed
23,948 citations measured
20,100
Articles in the corpus
12 years of B2B coverage
18,014
Distinct B2B topics tracked
across every vertical

The AI-answer layer

Where B2B buyers get their information now

Across 5 major AI engines: how often they name B2B brands, and how often they actually cite a source for it. Perplexity name-drops brands most (37.3%) yet cites its sources least (3.2%).

Named vs. cited, by engine

Perplexity34 pts uncited
37% named
3% cited
AI Overviews9 pts uncited
35% named
26% cited
AI Mode2 pts uncited
33% named
31% cited
Gemini23 pts uncited
32% named
9% cited
ChatGPT15 pts uncited
31% named
16% cited

From mention to citation

Brand mentioned
41,180
Mention backed by a citation
23,948 · 58%

Of every brand mention AI answers produce, the share that arrives backed by a source citation.

Perplexity leads in mention rate · Mention rate 37.3%

Prioritize content optimization for platforms like Perplexity.

AI Mode excels in citation ratio · Citation-to-mention ratio 0.94

Invest in ensuring content alignment with reliable sources.

Citation Rate Varies Widely · Platform spread 6.2 percentage points

Target platforms based on your content's credibility.

Third-Party Validation Crucial · From source_citation_share

Enhance third-party advocacy.

The attention map

What B2B actually talks about

Twelve years of B2B publishing across every vertical, 2017–2026: what the market writes about, and how that focus has shifted.

Publishing volume by year
180
'17
3.7k
'18
2.0k
'19
2.2k
'20
2.4k
'21
1.8k
'22
4.3k
'23
1.9k
'24
1.3k
'25
346
'26

Publishing volume is down 73% in 2026 vs. 2025.

Corpus at a glance
20,100
articles published
18,014
distinct topics
14,888
distinct tags
Top topics by article volume
Education Technology1% of corpus
94
Workforce Development1% of corpus
73
AV Rental Equipment1% of corpus
59
Digital Transformation1% of corpus
55
Leadership Development1% of corpus
52
Future Of Work1% of corpus
49
Professional Development1% of corpus
43
Future Of Education1% of corpus
43
School Safety1% of corpus
37
Healthcare Innovation1% of corpus
35
Coverage by vertical
Professional AV22% of corpus
4,498
Engineering & Construction16% of corpus
3,136
Healthcare13% of corpus
2,549
Education Technology11% of corpus
2,248
Energy6% of corpus
1,173
Retail6% of corpus
1,136
Software & Technology5% of corpus
1,084
Food & Beverage4% of corpus
848

What earns trust

What content actually performs

Customer stories continue to dominate as the leading format, underscoring the B2B market's continued trust in customer narratives over brand-produced content.

Performance vs. how much gets made
1
high-effort formats produced at below-median volume — the trust content that gets made the least
1
high-effort formats that also carry real volume — the workhorses programs lean on most
FormatProduction effort (mean level, 1–5)Volume
Event recap
High trust · under-produced
L3.3
8% of volume
Executive POV
High trust · under-produced
L2.7
8% of volume
Customer story
L3.1
20% of volume
Product walkthrough
L2.5
10% of volume
Partner perspective
L2.3
8% of volume
High-effort, under-producedEverything elseBar length = mean production effort
Format performance leaderboard
Customer storyTier 320% of volumeacross 8 channels
65
Expert interviewTier 45% of volumeacross 2 channels
48
Executive POVTier 38% of volumeacross 3 channels
47
Product walkthroughTier 310% of volumeacross 3 channels
46
Field insightTier 35% of volumeacross 2 channels
45
Internal expert breakdownTier 35% of volumeacross 2 channels
42
Event recapTier 38% of volumeacross 3 channels
42
Partner perspectiveTier 28% of volumeacross 2 channels
41

Early-stage formats are shown as directional and will firm up over time.

Trust signals that move buyers
Operational specificityseen in 900% of pieces
92
Named creator / expert sourceseen in 1600% of pieces
89
Real production investment (Level 3-5)seen in 2100% of pieces
85
Structured narrative arcseen in 500% of pieces
82
Multi-format distributionseen in 600% of pieces
78
Visual brand consistencyseen in 2100% of pieces
75
Production-tier distribution
3
Tier 1
16
Tier 2
16
Tier 3
5
Tier 4
0
Tier 5

Across 15 formats and 7 industries.

From the field

What B2B teams are telling us

The patterns that keep surfacing across B2B marketing teams, ordered by how broadly and how often each one shows up.

Signal 01

Trade shows are content triggers. Between them, most B2B teams go quiet.

B2B organizations consistently treat upcoming industry events and trade shows as deadlines that activate content production planning. Teams coordinate video shoots, interview logistics, and promotional materials specifically around these events. Outside of event windows, content production cadence tends to be lower and less structured.

Industry events are the primary forcing function for B2B content production. B2B marketing teams coordinate video, interviews, and promotional materials around trade show calendars, and content output drops sharply when no event is on the horizon.

For most B2B marketing teams, content production ramps when a trade show is approaching and stalls when one is not. The event calendar is, in practice, the editorial calendar.

B2B organizations treat upcoming industry events as hard deadlines that activate coordination across video production, interviews, and promotional materials. Outside those windows, output and structure tend to decline.

Signal 02

The production gap: why B2B video output stalls on lean teams

B2B marketing teams with limited headcount are consistently unable to maintain a regular cadence of video content production. Teams report that small staff sizes, competing priorities, and a lack of dedicated production resources create gaps in content output. This is a recurring operational challenge rather than a strategic disagreement about the value of video.

Lean B2B marketing teams consistently cite headcount and competing priorities as the primary reason video content production stalls. The gap is not strategic. Teams that want to produce video regularly are blocked by operational constraints, not ambivalence about video's value.

Most B2B marketing teams believe in video. Few have the operational infrastructure to produce it consistently. The gap between intent and output is a resource problem, not a strategic one.

Small marketing teams face a structural disadvantage with video: production requires time, coordination, and dedicated effort that competes directly with every other demand on limited staff.

Signal 03

Why B2B marketing programs stall during organizational transitions

B2B accounts are pausing or slowing marketing decisions due to internal organizational changes such as leadership departures, restructuring, layoffs, or onboarding of new executives. These transitions create decision-making gaps where no single owner can approve new initiatives. The effect is a temporary but recurring freeze on platform adoption and content strategy commitments.

When B2B organizations restructure, marketing programs stall. Leadership departures, layoffs, and executive onboarding create approval gaps that freeze platform adoption and content strategy decisions, sometimes for quarters at a time.

Organizational change is one of the most common reasons B2B marketing programs pause. When decision-making authority shifts, platform adoption and content commitments are often the first initiatives to slow.

Leadership transitions create a window where no single owner can approve new spend or strategy. For B2B marketing teams, that window can last weeks or months depending on how quickly new executives establish priorities.

Signal 04

Employee-Generated Content Is Stalling — and the Fix Isn't Motivation

Multiple B2B organizations are actively pursuing strategies to convert employees and subject matter experts into content creators, but face recurring barriers including reluctance to appear on camera, legal and content ownership concerns, and inconsistent participation. Teams are seeking structured workflows and platform support to lower the friction of getting employees to generate authentic video content at scale.

B2B organizations are pushing employees to become content creators, but the effort keeps stalling on the same friction points: camera reluctance, unclear ownership, and no repeatable system to keep participation consistent at scale.

Most employee content programs don't fail because the idea is wrong. They fail because there's no infrastructure behind the ask.

Getting subject matter experts on camera is a solved problem — when you give them a workflow instead of a request.

Signal 05

Why B2B content initiatives are stalling in 2026, and what separates teams that push through

B2B organizations are frequently citing active budget constraints as the primary reason for delaying or pausing new content marketing engagements. These delays are not rejections but deferrals, with teams indicating intent to revisit in a future quarter. The pattern cuts across company sizes and industries, suggesting a broad tightening of discretionary marketing spend.

Budget constraints are the leading reason B2B marketing initiatives stall in 2026. Teams are not walking away from content investment. They are deferring it, with most indicating plans to revisit within one to two quarters as conditions stabilize.

Discretionary marketing budgets are tightening across B2B sectors. New content initiatives are being deferred rather than canceled, a pattern that holds across company sizes and industries.

The dominant friction in B2B content marketing right now is not skepticism about value. It is timing. Budget cycles are compressing decisions and pushing new engagements into future quarters.

Proof it works

Outcome benchmarks

Client programs with hard performance numbers behind them: the outcomes B2B teams are actually shipping.

Building Management · 3Healthcare · 2Energy · 2Engineering & Construction · 1Software & Technology · 1
493%
RenewAire · Building Management
$0
CooperVision · Healthcare
+25%
BMS CAT · Engineering & Construction
104
EnerSys · Energy
90 min
Mitsubishi Electric Power Products · Energy
88
Improving · Software & Technology
Global
AMAG Technologies · Building Management
20–30
AMAG Technologies · Building Management
100+
GE HealthCare · Healthcare

On the calendar

173 upcoming industry events: 70 conferences, 55 expos, 25 summits.

Jun 13, 2026Professional AV trade showLas Vegas, NV
Jun 15, 2026Energy conferenceWashington, DC
Jun 15, 2026Building Management expoLas Vegas, NV
Jun 20, 2026Software & Technology conferenceSan Francisco, California
Jun 22, 2026Architecture & Design conferenceSan Francisco, CA
Jun 22, 2026Hospitality trade showMinneapolis, MN
Jun 22, 2026Building Management conferenceNashville, TN
Jun 28, 2026Food Beverage trade showNew York, NY

Where B2B shows up, by sector

Pro Av
18
Software And Technology
17
Business Services
16
Building Management
15
Transportation
14
Architecture And Design
14

Get the next field report

New signals, AI-visibility movement, and format performance land in your inbox as the data refreshes.

Go deeper with The State of GEO and The State of B2B Video Editing.